Posted by: bibmomma | November 11, 2008

Why I Support Embryonic Stem Cell Research

“]Dr. Yorgos Nikas/Photo Researchers, Inc.]
[Photo: Dr. Yorgos Nikas/Photo Researchers, Inc.
The subject of using embryonic stem cells for research has sparked much debate and controversy in the political, religious and social circles of our country.  As a Christian, mother and well-read American I support using embryonic stem cells for research supported by the National Institutes of Health and other scientific groups.

Let me preface all of these remarks by letting you know that recently I was told by another neurologist that I MAY not have Parkinson’s Disease.  Perhaps I have Dystonia, but we’re uncertain at this point in time.  Regardless, I have experienced the physical pain, rigid dystonia, imbalance and frustration that MANY people with Parkinson’s live with each day.  Even if I don’t have PD, I’m still on the band wagon to have the researchers use embryonic stem cells and I support all avenues to find a cure for this disease.  Here are some of my reasons:

* Embryonic stem cells do not have the same DNA structural abnormalities that adult stem cells have.  As we age and are exposed to chemicals, diseases and pollutants, our DNA is altered.  By using the blatocyst cells (cells harvested 5-7 days after conception) scientists will have stem cells free of structural abnormalities.

* Many of the 78 current embryonic stem cell lines cannot be used in humans.  Some were grown on cells of mice and cannot be injected into humans for fear of transmitting diseases.  Others in the current embryonic stem cell lines aren’t of good quality and simply cannot be used.

* Embryonic stem cells are harvested before the cells have even had a chance to differentiate or form human blood, systems or tissue.  They are a mass, as shown above in the picture. The cells have not had a chance to form into any organs, or tissue that form a human being.  In my mind and my heart, these cells are not humans  yet.

* The blatocyst cells are harvested for in-vitro fertilization by couples trying to conceive.  Why is it baby killing to use those cells for research and it’s not baby killing to inject several cells into a uterus knowing that most won’t survive, but hopefully one will?  Are we to condemn infertile couples trying to have a baby by using those cells knowing they will die?  This doesn’t make sense to me.  One decision is a choice, but the other is murder?  Who’s playing God now?

* Adult stem cells develop slowly and are more difficult to isolate.  Embryonic stem cells are easier to differentiate, easier to grow, to isolate, to purify and are easier to manipulate.  In order to transplant cells you need a plentiful amount.  Adult cells take a long time to develop and if a patient has a disease, there is the chance that the adult stem cell cannot be isolated without the disease being present.

* Without the influence of the media or politicians, I have prayerfully considered this topic.  Since blatocyst cells do not have any human characteristics, human organs or human tissues – BUT have the ability to develop into a human, I do not believe that those cells are human babies.  When they are harvested at the 5-7 day stage, they are not humans.

* Many people argue that adult stem cells are better for research because they do not put these moral and religious questions into play.  I disagree.  Blatocyst cells are only harvested when two people consent to do this.  If these two people are informed and agree to donate these cells to research then why is that “more evil” than destoying the thawed out cells by flushing them down the toilet?

* We can, as a nation of responsible Americans make sure that we have measures in place to ensure that “clones” are not produced in the research use of these embryonic stem cells.

* While this is an emotional issue in our country, I still believe that most folks live by the old adage, “It’s wrong until it’s your own ox getting gored.”  As our society ages, let’s see how many pro-life supporters retain their position when it’s their spouse that sits in a wheelchair, drools uncontrollably and cannot recognize them after 25 years of marriage.

* It didn’t take Parkinson’s Disease for me to decide that embryonic stem cell research wasn’t morally or religiously wrong.  I made this decision years ago, long before my ox was gored.


Responses

  1. [...] Go to read the rest [...]

  2. [...] The subject of using embryonic stem cells for research has sparked much debate and controversy in the political, religious and social circles of our country. As a Christian, mother and well-read American I support using embryonic stem … Read More [...]

  3. Hi Allie,

    My name is Justin Guild and I’m a graduate research assistant currently working with Dr. Jeong-Nam Kim (http://www.cla.purdue.edu/communication/people/jnkim.shtml) at Purdue University on a health communication study.

    Specifically, our research explores how information sharing behavior through online communities influences coping strategies among people with chronic conditions including cancer, diabetes, Parkinson’s, etc.

    I’m contacting you to seek permission to place a link to our online web survey on your blog to invite readers and other visitors to participate. The survey is purely academic in nature and takes no longer than 5-7 minutes to complete.

    The web survey can be found by clicking on this link: http://www.createsurvey.com/c/70237-Os3LDl/

    In the survey, we use the term “blog” to refer to any online activity where you might read or share information in communities such as personal web logs, internet forums, and discussion boards.

    The findings of this study could lead to better management capacities of chronic diseases as well as an increase in funding for research related to online communities.

    If you have any questions, or would like additional information, please don’t hesitate to contact me at jguild@purdue.edu.

    Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Sincerely,

    Justin Guild

  4. [...] Let’s be clear….there ARE other types of stem cells that can be used for research.  However, scientists are able to get the dopamine neurons from authentic embryonic stem cells than from other stem cell sources.  In order to read my position on embryonic stem cell research, go to:  http://bibmomma.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/why-i-support-embryonic-stem-cell-research/ [...]

  5. I admire your prayerful consideration of the topic of embryonic stem cell research, but as a fellow Christian i must insist that we rely on God’s word as His divine and holy guidance for our lives and especially issues as such. As Jesus says in John 17:17 “Sanctify them in the truth; Your word is truth.” God bless you sister.

    • Thanks for your blessing! The wonderful thing about freedom of expression is that we CAN disagree without punishment or recourse! There are many, many scriptures that do not support the idea of an blatocyst being a person. Yet, I know many scriptures that help us make the assumption that a person existed before being born. My hope is that everyone for or against embryonic stem cell research will take the view of what will help people the most WHEN THE BIBLE DOES NOT GIVE US SPECIFIC DIRECTION. That’s the beauty of free will – those who are against embryonic stem cell research now have the freedom to take a pledge – as suggested by Chicago11 (see Comments http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/susan_brooks_thistlethwaite/2009/03/the_moral_imperative_to_reliev/all_comments.html). The rational and moral consequences of a true believer should result in consistency with their words and deeds. “For all the people who are so adamant against embryonic cell research, take a very public and legally-binding lifetime pledge to forego any treatment, drug or protocol that may have been developed because of this basic research; further, pledge to actively investigate whether such treatment, etc. is derived from this research; and finally, in consideration of the legal limitations of binding ensuing generations, publicly and vocally assert your intention to actively discredit any of your grown children from making such treatment decisions for themselves and their minor children. “


Leave a response

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories